No Academy silverware but the future is looking encouraging

Author: Doron

Follow me on Twitter

And it came to pass on Friday night that there was to be no end-of-season trophy for United’s Academy this time around. With the league title out of reach, one might suggest that as United’s high standards go, it’s been a disappointing campaign. But no, looking beyond the results, as is necessary at this level, there’s a whole plethora of things to be pleased with and excited about.

Cast your mind back to the beginning of the season and United lost six out of their opening nine league games (whisper it, but United have only managed six league wins all season!). We were, to some extent, watching a team get bullied – United’s pool of players were not only inexperienced but physically small. It was that issue of stature and power that they found hard to cope with; losing 50:50s; being beaten aerially; and simply finding themselves out-muscled.

A huge chunk of credit has to go to Paul McGuinness and his staff for persisting with an attacking system and approach – but more on that and its importance to the club as a whole to come.

To get an idea of the kind of experience in the squad this season we can break the team down into second year (final year) scholars; first year scholars; and schoolboys (U16s or below who don’t train at the club full-time yet). So far this season we’ve used 8 second years; 17 first years; 4 schoolboys; 1 trialist; and 3 over-age players. Don’t work on the assumption that all the second years play every game though!

Even amongst the second years, experience was somewhat limited. Whilst Blackett and Van Velzen were most of the time guaranteed starters in last year’s successful FA Youth Cup campaign, the others fared differently. Goalkeepers, Liam Jacob and Joe Coll played second-fiddle to Sam Johnstone; Luke McCullough missed almost all of his first year with groin injuries; and the trio of Charni Ekangamene, Tom Lawrence and Luke Hendrie were often little more than peripheral squad players.

As the season progressed, it became clear that in one respect it was going to follow a similar pattern to the first team’s. Injuries hit the squad in virtually every area and as one player would return, another would get injured. The area that felt it in particular was the midfield, as arguably the first choice five of Ben Pearson, Joe Rothwell, Mats Daehli, Adnan Januzaj and Tom Lawrence all missed lengthy spells – often at similar times.

Despite the various set-backs, United went full steam into the FA Youth Cup. Paul McGuinness preferred to play players out of position (e.g. James Weir, usually a central midfielder, played at right back) rather than change his system due to unavailable players. Knowing how well we could play but appreciating how hard the season had been, I cautiously suggested that getting to the quarter finals would represent a good campaign – draw dependent though, we could potentially go further or find ourselves in trouble early on.

As things went, we had a mixed bag of ties. Torquay at home was straightforward but then followed Derby who’d gone away to Arsenal and beaten them. Boasting several players who’d featured in their first team, Derby provided a stern test which only goals from Jack Barmby could help United overcome. Once again the draw was unkind as United went on an unfancied trip to Swansea – a side who played football in the style of their first team and who’d beaten one of the competition’s favourites, Liverpool. A youthful side trounced Swansea 5-1 in an astonishing performance – by this point, schoolboy, Nick Ioannou had come to the fore and made sure that he was first choice centre back in this competition (he’d play ever other game in the cup run).

Old Trafford was the setting for United’s last win in the competition. Like Derby, Charlton had players with first team experience and although many weren’t older than the United boys, they were considerably bigger. The tie was settled deep into injury time as James Wilson, an exciting talent from the U16s, scored to seal a 3-2 win. For the second year running, Chelsea were the semi final opponents over two legs.

This year, Chelsea were better. The breakdown of their squad in terms of players and the year they were in was not too dissimilar to United’s but they had some crucial experience and expensive, exciting talents in Piazon and Feruz up front. An even first leg in Manchester saw Chelsea take a 2-1 lead back to London. The second leg, like the first was incredibly tight with little between the sides and a draw on the night seemed fair, taking Chelsea into the final with a 3-2 aggregate win where they’ll face Blackburn. Jack Barmby scored in every round of the competition but other players also shone – the two schoolboys, Ioannou and Wilson; the increasingly influential Daehli; McCullough and Blackett became leaders; Grimshaw, Rothwell and Pearson all did well to return from long-term injuries; and Sam Byrne, the only striker in the squad and one of the youngest members, grew in stature, quality and the cleverness of his positional game.

The experience gained by the cup run will serve the squad well. The majority of those who played were first years as the likes of Hendrie, Ekangamene and goalkeepers, Jacob and Coll, were ousted by younger players. More importantly, there’s some quality. The FA Youth Cup represents the only real time when McGuinness will pick his strongest team rather than rotate like in the league. That quality was reaffirmed as both an U19 side and an U17 side got the finals of prestigious global youth tournaments recently, in America and Holland respectively.

Having praised various players, McGuinness and his staff should also get some attention. After Sir Alex, Paul has potentially the hardest job in the club – producing players for the first team and preparing them both tactically and as young men. It’s the tactics though that’s particularly important. The first team have started to try and play a 4-2-3-1 system and both McGuinness and Warren Joyce have perfected it. They have technically sound players playing in an incredibly fluid and exciting system who’ll graduate through the levels and will be ready to play that way for the first team should they make it that far. United are importantly now matching football trends worldwide, coaching players to play primarily this way. Paul has implemented it perfectly, is winning playing it, and, he’s taught small players who were once bullied off the ball how to use their skills to their advantage.

Some would look at the season and bemoan a lack of silverware but when you look beyond the results, particularly in the league and watch the way the players have developed and grown-up, there’s much to be pleased with. A minimum of seventeen of the squad will still be in the Academy next year in what could well be a successful season given the strong group of players. Even with league games left to play, it’s a big well done to Paul McGuinness, the staff, and the players – some of whom may even be rewarded with (further) Reserves outings before the season is done.

Follow on twitter

VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
Rating: 9.6/10 (12 votes cast)
VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
Rating: +6 (from 6 votes)
No Academy silverware but the future is looking encouraging, 9.6 out of 10 based on 12 ratings

4 Responses to “No Academy silverware but the future is looking encouraging”

  1. JGC says:

    Doron, really good article.
    I agree with your thoughts. The future is very bright with the amount of young talent we have in the reserves and academy.
    We see so many negative comments about our current first team midfield and the way Sir Alex is managing the situation and their solution is nearly always to buy a world class midfielder. I often think these so called fans never bother to look beyond the end of their nose.
    Look at the potential (note it is just potential at this stage) mid-fielders we currently have in the reserves and academy that could make it in the first team over the next two to three years.

    Reserves: L.Cole, M.James, O.Norwood, D.Petrucci, P.Pogba, R.Tunnecliffe,
    J.Lingard (age 19 – 21)

    Academy: B.Pearson, J.Rothwell, A.Januzaj, M.Daehli, G.Van Velzen, J.Barmby,
    J.Rudge. (age 17 – 18)

    The prospects in the next two to three years are mouth watering.
    I cannot help but think Sir Alex is holding off making a big signing because of the potential he sees in the reserves and academy.

    Although having a Modric or a Muniain in the squad would be great. :0)

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  2. @JGC

    Thanks for the comment and kind words.

    It’s an interesting one – there’s plenty of talent but we should be acutely aware of the fact that you only often get one or two from each generation ‘making it’. For example, I have my doubts about Norwood, Tunnicliffe (despite the fact I’m a big fan) and others.

    I doubt Fergie is relying on them – his pursuit of Sneijder and Nasri last summer suggests he’s aware that we need more ammunition but I think the main reason he’s not bought is that he doesn’t have the funding to compete at the top level necessarily right now. We’re not a City, Chelsea or Madrid – everyone knows that to some extent Fergie’s hands are tied by the owners. We’ll just have to see.

    You’re right that we should have faith in our own production line mind you.

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  3. sid says:

    good article but i think people who are all talking about the attacking midfielders are wrong i keep hearing that hazard, sneider or modric are the answer personally i think we have enough attacking talent just dont have a good enough person to cover the back. carrick is good but his passing ability and the lack of desire to get forward is what causes the team, to not be able to flow well. its not a critism of carrick it just that he is more of a pirlo type and needs someone to help him so he can become the tue creator of the team.
    if we bought someone like n’villa lassana diarra or even tiote. someone to tackle then play a short five yard pass to the attackers we would be much better. it would free rooney to play more forward carrick/scholes would have confidence to leave the edge of their own box and cleverly when played would be able to play higher up the pitch. not to mention it would actually hide our problems at the back playing against traditional No10 types.

    the rest of our team is actually top european class i would got as far to say we are just below the top four in terms of players(madrid, barca,bayern, city). if we had good solid destroyer in the middle of the pitch we would actually be in that top group. we have the depth as well as good future prospects.

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  4. @sid – thanks for that comment but this was an article about our Academy, not our first team midfield!

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)

Leave a Reply